An insider’s view of the new diagnostic and statistical manual of North American psychiatry (DSM-5)

https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v44i2.1361

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML

Published: May 31, 2013
Issue: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2013)
Section Viewpoints

Publcation metrics

442 | 343 | 127




 


Main Article Content

Authors

Javier I. Escobar Associate Dean for Global Health Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
Abstract

The relevance/ and visibility of psychiatric disorders within the realm of medicine has significantly increased in recent times, possibly due to their high frequency and the negative impact they have on cost, disability and quality of life. The subjective nature of these disorders, their clinical complexity and the absence of reliable markers, keep us completely dependent on anamnesis and clinical examination. All of this, forces us, periodically, to review and refine diagnostic systems, hoping to improve the recognition and effective management of mental disorders. The scientific progress in basic neuroscience, observed during and following the “decade of the brain”, coupled with a lack of satisfaction with the existing system (DSM-IV) suggested it was the moment to embark in this task, hence the process leading to DSM-5.

 

How to Cite
Escobar, J. I. (2013). An insider’s view of the new diagnostic and statistical manual of North American psychiatry (DSM-5). Colombia Medica, 44(2), 129–131. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v44i2.1361
References

1. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R. diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972; 26: 57-63.

2. Spitzer RL, Endicott JE, Robins E. Research diagnostic criteria, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978; 35: 773-82

3. Hyman SE. Can neuroscience be integrated in the DSM-V?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007; 8:725-32.

4. Insel TR. Cuthbert BN, Endophenotypes. bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 66: 988-9.

5. Insel T. Transforming diagnosis. NIMH Director’s Blog, http:// www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/index.shtml

6. Psychiatry’s guide is out of touch with science, experts say. The New York Times, May 6, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/07/health.

7.Satel SL. Why the fuss over the DSM-5?. The New York Times. 2013 July 12, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/opinion/sunday.

8.Lieberman, Insel issue joint statement about DSM-5 and RDoC. Psychiatric News. Tuesday, May 14th. 2013.

Usage statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Received 2013-05-31
Accepted 2013-05-31
Published 2013-05-31

The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use