Colposcopia. Su importancia actual en el diagnóstico de la neoplasia cervical intraepitelial, Expriencia del autor
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Merlo JG. Diagnóstico precoz del cáncer genital femenino. Salvat Editores, 1981, pp. 31-62.
Wethich DW. Analysis of the factors involved in the colposcopic evaluation of 2,194 patients with anormal PAP smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 1339-42.
Carrera JM, Dexeus S, Coopez F. Tratado y atlas de colposcopia. 3ª ed, Salvat Editores, 1974, pp. 6-10.
Díaz CA, Aragón M. Correlación citológica e histológica de las imágenes colposcópicas en el diagnóstico de neoplasia cervical. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1992; 43: 122-23.
Benedet JL. A quality control program for colposcopic pratcice. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 872-75.
González A, Echavarría LG. Criterios de calidad en diagnóstico colposcópico. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1994; 45: 227-30.
Stafl A, Wilbanks GD. Terminología internacional de la colposcopia. Reporte de la nomenclatura de Comité de la Federación Internacional de Patología Cervical y Colposcopia. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 26-8.
González A, Jimenéz ME. Experiencia en el diagnóstico colposcópico en un centro de patología cervicouterina a nivel regional. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1993; 44: 49-52.
Drescher CW, Peter WA, Roberts JA. Contribution of endocervial curettage in evaluation of abnormal cervical citology. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 343-46.
Krebs HB, Wheelock JB. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications. Gynecology 1987; 69: 601-04.
Feldman MJ, Seeve CC, Srebnick E. False positive cervical citology and important reason for colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122: 945-48.
Jones DE. Evaluation of the atypic PAP smear. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 544-47.
Franco P, Gallego G. Evalución de la colposcopia en el estudio de las pacientes con neoplasia cervical. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1992; 43: 208-11.
Ronk DA, Jimerson GJ, Merril JA. Evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 49: 581-86.
Fejgin JC. Diagnostic value of colposcopic in the investigation of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 137: 588-90.
Feldman MJ, Seeve CC, Srebnick E. False positive of cervical citology. An important reason for colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122: 945-49.
Davis GD. Colposcopic examination of the vagina. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993; 20: 217-29.
McCord ML. Discrepancia entre la citología y la biopsia dirigida por colposcopia. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 45-8.
Downloads
Accepted 2014-11-04
Published 2014-11-04
Similar Articles
- Dabeiba Adriana García, Yazmín Rocío Arias, Fabio Ancízar Aristizábal, Detection of genes mutations in the K-ras, H-ras and EGFR in samples of blood plasma and cervical smears for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III and cervical cancer , Colombia Medica: Vol. 40 No. 1 (2009)
- Israel Meza G, Tratamiento con electrocauterización de las lesiones premalignas del cérvix , Colombia Medica: Vol. 26 No. 4 (1995)
- Lina Angélica Buitrago Reyes, Oscar Andrés Gamboa Garay, Jairo Alonso Hernández, Age, period and cohort effects on mortality from cervical cancer in Colombia between 1985 and 2014. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 53 No. 1 (2022): Cancer incidence and mortality
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use