Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Page Header Logo
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Focus and scope
    • Editorial Management Process
  • EDITORIAL POLICY
    • Ethical Publication Standards
    • Open Access Policy
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright
    • Policy for Journal Archiving
    • Claim Policy
  • AUTHORS
    • Guidelines to Authors
    • Sending and Receiving Papers
    • Structure and Content of Articles
    • Article Evaluation Process
    • ORCID
    • coi_disclosure Colombia Médica ICMJE
    • Copyright Transfer Statement Colombia Médica
  • PEER REVIEW
    • Peer Review Process
    • Evaluation Forms
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • Editorial team
    • Contact
  • ARTICLES
    • Current
    • Archives
  • COLLECTIONS
Search
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol 49 No 2 (2018) /
  4. Original Articles

Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References

Abstract

Objective: To develop anthropometric equations to predict body fat percentage (BF%) in adult women. Methods: In 151 women (aged 18-59) BF% was obtained by hydrodensitometry with simultaneous measurement of lung volumes. Body weight, height, eight- skinfold thickness (STs) and six- circumference (CIs) measurements were obtained from all participants. Subjects data were randomly divided in two groups, equation-building group (n=106) and validation group (n=45). The equation-building group was used to run multiple linear regression models using anthropometric measurements as predictors to find the best prediction equations of the BF%. The validation group was used to compare the performance of the new equations with those of Durnin-Womersley, Jackson-Pollock and Ramirez-Torun. Results: There were two preferred equations: Equation 1 = 11.76 + (0.324 x tricipital ST) + (0.133 x calf ST) + (0.347 x abdomen CI) + (0.068 x age) - (0.135 x height) and Equation 2 = 11.37 + (0.404 x tricipital ST) + (0.153 x axilar ST) + (0.264 x abdomen CI) + (0.069 x age) - (0.099 x height). There were no significant differences in BF% obtained by hydrodensitometry (31.5±5.3) and Equation 1 (31.0±4.0) and Equation 2 (31.2±4.0). The BF% estimated by Durning-Womersley (35.8±4.0), Jackson-Pollock (26.5±5.4) and Ramirez-Torun (32.6±4.8) differed from hydrodensitometry (p<0.05). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was high between hydrodensitometry and Equation 1 (ICC=0.77), Equation 2 (ICC=0.76), and Ramirez-Torun equation (ICC=0.75). The ICC was low between hydrodensitometry and Durnin-Womersley (ICC=0.51) and Jackson-Pollock (ICC=0.53) equations. Conclusion: The new Equations-1 and 2, performed better than the commonly used anthropometric equations to predict BF% in adult women.

Authors

  • Juan C. Aristizabal 1. Physiology and Biochemistry Research Group (PHYSIS), University of Antioquia, Medellín-Colombia. 2. School of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellín-Colombia.
  • Alejandro Estrada Restrepo
  • Argenis Giraldo García

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • fat free mass
  • fat mass
  • body fat
  • fat mass percentage
  • hydrodensitometry
  • anthropometry
  • underwater weighing
  • validation study
  • prediction equations.

References

ICBF. Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar: Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional en Colombia 2010. Bogotá, Colombia: Da Vinci Editores & CÍA S N C; 2011.2011.

Cornier MA, Després JP, Davis N, Grossniklaus DA, Klein S, Lamarche B, et al. Assessing adiposity: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(18):1996-2019.

Thibault R, Genton L, Pichard C. Body composition: why, when and for who? Clin Nutr. 2012;31(4):435-47.

Grundy SM. Adipose tissue and metabolic syndrome: too much, too little or neither. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(11):1209-17.

Kanellakis S, Skoufas E, Khudokonenko V, Apostolidou E, Gerakiti L, Andrioti MC, et al. Development and validation of two equations based on anthropometry, estimating body fat for the Greek adult population. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(2):408-16.

Waidyatilaka I, de Silva A, de Lanerolle-Dias M, Atukorala S, Lanerolle P. A field tool for prediction of body fat in Sri Lankan women: skinfold thickness equation. J Health Popul Nutr. 2016;35(1):31.

Hastuti J, Kagawa M, Byrne NM, Hills AP. Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations for estimation of body fat in Indonesian men. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013;22(4):522-9.

Stevens J, Ou FS, Cai J, Heymsfield SB, Truesdale KP. Prediction of percent body fat measurements in Americans 8 years and older. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(4):587-94.

Nevill AM, Metsios GS, Jackson AS, Wang J, Thornton J, Gallagher D. Can we use the Jackson and Pollock equations to predict body density/fat of obese individuals in the 21st century? Int J Body Compos Res. 2008;6(3):114-21.

Bellisari A, Roche AF. Antropometría y ecografía. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going S, editors. Composición Corporal. Mexico, D.F.: McGraw-Hill; 2007. p. 109-128.

Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M. Validity of body composition methods across ethnic population groups. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40 Suppl 1:S246-9.

Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32(1):77-97.

Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Practical assessment of body composition. The physician and sport medicine. 1985;13(5):76-90.

Ramirez-Zea M, Torun B, Martorell R, Stein AD. Anthropometric predictors of body fat as measured by hydrostatic weighing in Guatemalan adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(4):795-802.

Aristizabal JC, Restrepo MT, Lopez A. [Validation by hydrodensitometry of skinfold thickness equations used for female body composition assessment]. Biomedica. 2008;28(3):404-13.

Lohman T, Roche A, Martorell R. Antropometric Standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988. p. 2-80.

Going S. Hidrodensitometría y pletismografía de desplazamiento de aire. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going S, editors. Composición Corporal. Mexico, D.F.: McGraw-Hill; 2007. p. 17-34.

Heyward VH. Practical body composition assessment for children, adults, and older adults. Int J Sport Nutr. 1998;8(3):285-307.

Lohman T. Advances in Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics Publishers; 1992. p. 1-5.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.

Sandhu J, Giniya G, Shenoy S. Estimation of body composition in Indian population using skin-fold thickness and body-mass-index-based prediction equations: comparison and validation using under-water weighing machine. International Journal of Body Composition Research 2010 Vol 8 No 2: 51–56.

Medoua GN, Nana ES, Essa'a VJ, Ntsama PM, Matchawe C, Rikong HA, et al. Body composition of Cameroonian lactating women determined by anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, and deuterium dilution. Nutrition. 2011;27(4):414-9.

Jackson AS, Ellis KJ, McFarlin BK, Sailors MH, Bray MS. Cross-validation of generalised body composition equations with diverse young men and women: the Training Intervention and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER) Study. Br J Nutr. 2009;101(6):871-8.

Rojas W, Parra MV, Campo O, Caro MA, Lopera JG, Arias W, et al. Genetic make up and structure of Colombian populations by means of uniparental and biparental DNA markers. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;143(1):13-20.

Price AL, Patterson N, Yu F, Cox DR, Waliszewska A, McDonald GJ, et al. A genomewide admixture map for Latino populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80(6):1024-36.

  • PDF
  • PDF (ESPAÑOL) (Español (España))
  • Full Text
  • HTML (ESPAÑOL) (Español (España))
Published
2018-06-29
Submitted
2017-11-14
| 1124 |
How to Cite
Aristizabal, J., Estrada Restrepo, A., & Giraldo García, A. (2018). Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women. Colombia Médica, 49(2), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v49i2.3643
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Issue
Vol 49 No 2 (2018)
Section
Original Articles

The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use

Online ISSN: 1657-9534
Make a Submission

Bibliographics database

Full-text database

Citation Index

Bibliographical information system

Memberships

Licencia Creative Commons
This work is under License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) .

Indexed

.
0.82
2018CiteScore
 
 
68th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
.
Information
  • For Authors
Universidad del Valle
Universidad del Valle
  • Cali - Colombia
  • © 1994 - 2020
Dirección:
  • Ciudad Universitaria Meléndez
  • Calle 13 # 100-00
  •  
  • Sede San Fernando
  • Calle 4B N° 36-00
PBX:
  • +57 2 3212100
  • Línea gratuita: 018000 22 00 21
  • A.A.25360
Redes Sociales:

2020 Universidad del Valle - Vigilada MinEducación

//Go to www.addthis.com/dashboard to customize your tools