Perception of the healthcare accreditation system in Colombia.
Abstract
Introduction:Accreditation is an external, systematic, periodic, and voluntary evaluation process to which health care institutions submit themselves in order to demonstrate compliance with superior levels of quality of care. The Icontec, through an evaluative model, accredits the quality of health institutions in Colombia.
Methods:Descriptive cross-sectional study following the recommendations of the survey study report. Using an electronic format, 22 health institutions with experience in the Icontec accreditation process were surveyed. The instrument evaluated three thematic axes of the process: added value provided by the accreditation process, evaluation process and final report. The measurement was carried out using a Likert-type scale and a descriptive statistical analysis to establish the perception of the phases of the process.
Results:the items with the best perception were the humanization of care (86.4%) followed by patient safety and teamwork (81.8%). After accreditation, the quality of the processes improved (77.4%), infection prevention and control (68.1%) and physician commitment (63.6%). 54.6% felt that evaluators use different methods of evaluation. 63.6% of the respondents considered that Icontec does not comply with the times defined for the delivery of the report.
Conclusion:the Icontec accreditation system adds value to health institutions in most of the thematic areas evaluated, especially in the humanization of care and patient safety. The lowest perception is presented in the increase of physicians' commitment.
Authors
Downloads
Keywords
- Health facility administration
- quality assurance
- health care
- risk management
- quality improvement
- health facilities
- patient safety
- delivery of health care
References
Braithwaite J, Westbrook J, Pawsey M, Greenfield D, Naylor J, Iedema R, et al. A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-113
Gonzalez MIR. Manual de Acreditación en Salud Ambulatorio y Hospitalario de Colombia. Vol. 1. 2015. 1-100 p.
Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC). Que es la Acreditación en Salud - Acreditación en Salud [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: https://acreditacionensalud.org.co/que-es-la-acreditacion-en-salud/
Hospital standardization:Historical. Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 1917;RG5/SG5/S0(Collection 1):23. Available from: https://gencat5.eloquent-systems.com/webcat/request/Action?ClientSession=158cc092:177d7c8b6e4:-7fcf&UniqueID=6000_3443_2&TemplateProcessID=6000_3443&PromptID=&ParamID=&TemplateProcessID=6000_1051_1051&PromptID=&ParamID=&CMD_(DetailRequest)[0]=&ProcessID=6
Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Developing the evidence base for accreditation of healthcare organisations: A call for transparency and innovation. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2009;18(3):162-3.
https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.032359
Shaw CD. Evaluating accreditation. Vol. 15, International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2003. p. 455-6.
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg092
Novaes HM, Neuhauser D. Hospital accreditation in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Heal. 2000;7(6):425-30.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892000000600019
Morales-Novaes H, Paganini JM. Entandares E Indicadores Para La Acreditación De Hospitales En América Latina Y El Caribe [Internet]. 1994. p. xiii. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s16603s/s16603s.pdf
Ministerio de Salud y de la Protección Social de Colombia. Manuales de estándares del sistema único de acreditación. 2006;2006.
Ministerio de Salud y de la Protección Social de Colombia. Manual de Acreditación en Salud Ambulatorio y Hospitalario de Colombia versión 3.1 [Internet]. 19-11-2018. 2018. p. 81. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-5095-de-2018.pdf
Ministerio de Salud y de la Protección Social de Colombia. Organización del sistema de garantía de calidad de la atención de salud del sistema general de seguridad social en salud-Decreto 2309 de 2002. Arsyad, Azhar, Colombia; 2002 p. 17.
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
El Autor. Declaración de la iniciativa CHERRIES: adaptación al castellano de directrices para la comunicación de resultados de cuestionarios y encuestas online. Aten Primaria. 2019;51(9):586-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2019.03.005
Manning WJ, Farrell MB, Bezold LI, Choi JY, Cockroft KM, Gornik HL, et al. How Do Noninvasive Imaging Facilities Perceive the Accreditation Process? Results of an Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Survey. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38(7):401-6.
https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22408
Alkhenizan A, Shaw C. Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: A systematic review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(4):407-16.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.83204
Carrasco-Peralta JA, Herrera-Usagre M, Reyes-Alcázar V, Torres-Olivera A. Healthcare accreditation as trigger of organisational change: The view of professionals. J Healthc Qual Res [Internet]. 2019;34(2):59-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.09.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.09.007
Greenfield D, Civil M, Donnison A, Hogden A, Hinchcliff R, Westbrook J, et al. A mechanism for revising accreditation standards: A study of the process, resources required and evaluation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:0-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0571-8
Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: A systematic review. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2008;20(3):172-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn005
Al-Awa B, de Wever A, Melot C, Devreux I. An overview of patient safety and accreditation: A literature review study. Vol. 5, Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011. p. 200-23. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjmsci.2011.200.223
Instituto colombiano de normas técnicas y certificación. Ejes de la Acreditación en Salud [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.elhospital.com/temas/Ejes-de-la-Acreditacion-en-Salud,-una-transformacion-cultural+105489
Cdc. Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings : An Overview [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. p. 1-27. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/index.html
World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO | Background to Clean Care is Safer Care [Internet]. Who. 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/gpsc/background/en/
Resar R, FA G, C H, TW N. Using Care Bundles to Improve Health Care Quality. IHI Innov Ser white Pap [Internet]. 2012;(26):1-14. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/knowledge/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/UsingCareBundles.aspx%5Cnfile:///C:/Users/Rie Johansen/Downloads/IHIUsingCareBundlesWhitePaper2012 (1).pdf
Ehlers LH, Jensen MB, Simonsen KB, Rasmussen GS, Braithwaite J. Attitudes towards accreditation among hospital employees in Denmark: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2017;29(5):693-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx090
Elkins G, Cook T, Dove J, Markova D, Marcus JD, Meyer T, et al. Perceived Stress Among Nursing and Administration Staff Related to Accreditation. Clin Nurs Res. 2010;19(4):376-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773810373078

Copyright (c) 2021 Universidad del Valle

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use