Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Page Header Logo
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Focus and scope
    • Editorial Management Process
  • EDITORIAL POLICY
    • Ethical Publication Standards
    • Open Access Policy
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright
    • Policy for Journal Archiving
    • Claim Policy
  • AUTHORS
    • Guidelines to Authors
    • Sending and Receiving Papers
    • Structure and Content of Articles
    • Article Evaluation Process
    • ORCID
    • coi_disclosure Colombia Médica ICMJE
    • Copyright Transfer Statement Colombia Médica
  • PEER REVIEW
    • Peer Review Process
    • Evaluation Forms
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • Editorial team
    • Contact
  • ARTICLES
    • Current
    • Archives
  • COLLECTIONS
Search
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol 53 No 4 (2022): The death debate /
  4. Editorial

The need for education about death in medical practice

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Author Biographies
  • References

Abstract

Colombia is one of the leading countries in the world regarding regulations and rights at the end of life. Currently, legislation on access to palliative care, limitation of therapeutic effort, euthanasia, euthanasia in children and adolescents, conscientious objection for doctors, and medically assisted suicide is decriminalized. Meanwhile, the remaining Latin American countries are just beginning the discussion about dignified death. Among many reasons for this delay, one of them is that it begins with the most controversial of issues, euthanasia, instead of focusing on humanizing the end of life.

Although, etymologically, euthanasia means "good death," a good death does not mean euthanasia. The definition of a good death is complicated because it corresponds to an individual notion affected by culture, religion, society, and medical science. Due to the lack of definition, the tools available to estimate the quality of death and end-of-life care are still unreliable. One of the most recognized criteria to define a good death is the preference of the place to die of the patient, but this depends on factors of the individual, their family environment, the disease, the logistical possibilities of the health system, and the health team that accompanies the process. Some of these determinants can be modified, but not others. Health team care is the one with the greatest potential and, possibly, requires the most investment in education and organization.

For physicians, death is transforming from being a natural part of the human experience into a crisis of patient health from which they must be rescued. In addition, technology-based clinical training ensures that they are well qualified to prolong life and poorly prepared to confront death or discuss it with their patients. The problem is bigger than it seems because the conviction about reliance on hospital-based, technologized medicine at the end of life is applicable to them. Research in Canada found that physicians died more in intensive care units and used more palliative care than the general population, but there was no difference in the possibility of dying at home.

Authors

  • Mauricio Palacios Gómez 1 Editor in Chief, Colombia Médica. 2 Escuela de ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8091-9954
  • Yiny Torres Valencia Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-6758

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

  • Thanatology
  • Ethicists
  • Euthanasia
  • Right to Die
  • Attitude to Death
  • Medical Education

Author Biographies


, 1 Editor in Chief, Colombia Médica. 2 Escuela de ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia

orcid_id14.png https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8091-9954


, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá Colombia.

orcid_id14.png https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-6758

References

Krikorian A, Maldonado C, Pastrana T. Patient's Perspectives on the Notion of a Good Death: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Nov 8];59(1):152-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.033 PMid:31404643

Kupeli N, Candy B, Tamura-Rose G, Schofield G, Webber N, Hicks SE, et al. Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties. Patient [Internet]. 2019 Apr 12 [cited 2022 Nov 8];12(2):183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0328-2 PMid:30141020 PMCid:PMC6397142

Costa V, Earle CC, Esplen MJ, Fowler R, Goldman R, Grossman D, et al. The determinants of home and nursing home death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care [Internet]. 2016 Jan 20 [cited 2022 Nov 9];15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0077-8 PMid:26791258 PMCid:PMC4721064

Hetzler PT, Dugdale LS. How Do Medicalization and Rescue Fantasy Prevent Healthy Dying? AMA J ethics [Internet]. 2018 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Oct 28];20(8):766-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.766 PMid:30118427

Wunsch H, Scales D, Gershengorn HB, Hua M, Hill AD, Fu L, et al. End-of-Life Care Received by Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2019 Jul 26 [cited 2022 Nov 2];2(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7650 PMid:31339549 PMCid:PMC6659139

Smith R. Death and the bogus contract between doctors and patients. BMJ [Internet]. 2022 Jun 7 [cited 2022 Nov 10];377. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1415 PMid:35672046

Sutherland R. Focus: Death: Dying Well-Informed: The Need for Better Clinical Education Surrounding Facilitating End-of-Life Conversations. Yale J Biol Med [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Nov 10];92(4):757. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6913833/

Heath I. Denial of death. In: Matters of life and deathKey writing. Katz Editors; 2008.

Chadborn NH, Devi R, Williams C, Sartain K, Goodman C, Gordon AL. GPs' involvement to improve care quality in care homes in the UK: a realist review. Heal Serv Deliv Res [Internet]. 2021 Oct [cited 2022 Nov 10];9(20):1-76. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr09200 PMid:34730923

Spilsbury K, Rosenwax L. Community-based specialist palliative care is associated with reduced hospital costs for people with non-cancer conditions during the last year of life. BMC Palliat Care [Internet]. 2017 Dec 8 [cited 2022 Oct 27];16(1):68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0256-2 PMid:29216873 PMCid:PMC5721619

Kaur P, Wu HY, Hum A, Heng BH, Tan WS. Medical cost of advanced illnesses in the last-year of life-retrospective database study. Age Ageing [Internet]. 2022 Jan 6 [cited 2022 Oct 27];51(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab212 PMid:34673931

Bharmal A, Morgan T, Kuhn I, Wee B, Barclay S. Palliative and end-of-life care and junior doctors': a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 9];0:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001954 PMid:31722983 PMCid:PMC9726967

  • pdf
  • pdf (Español (España))
  • Full text
  • Texto (Español (España))
Published
2022-12-21
Submitted
2023-01-16
| 362 |
How to Cite
Palacios Gómez, M., & Torres Valencia, Y. (2022). The need for education about death in medical practice. Colombia Médica, 53(4), e1005510. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v53i4.5510
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Issue
Vol 53 No 4 (2022): The death debate
Section
Editorial

Copyright (c) 2022 Universidad del Valle

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use

Online ISSN: 1657-9534
Make a Submission

Bibliographics database

Full-text database

Citation Index

Bibliographical information system

Memberships

Licencia Creative Commons
This work is under License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) .

Indexed

.
0.82
2018CiteScore
 
 
68th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
.
Information
  • For Authors
Universidad del Valle
Universidad del Valle
  • Cali - Colombia
  • © 1994 - 2020
Dirección:
  • Ciudad Universitaria Meléndez
  • Calle 13 # 100-00
  •  
  • Sede San Fernando
  • Calle 4B N° 36-00
PBX:
  • +57 2 3212100
  • Línea gratuita: 018000 22 00 21
  • A.A.25360
Redes Sociales:

2020 Universidad del Valle - Vigilada MinEducación

//Go to www.addthis.com/dashboard to customize your tools