Main Article Content

Assess the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Family Needs Assessment (FNA) questionnaire designed for adults in Colombia. Conducting research studies to validate the FNA questionnaire in other contexts and age groups is important.

Five hundred fifty-four caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities participated in the study (298 men and 256 women). The ages of the individuals with disabilities ranged from 18 to 76 years. The authors carried out the linguistic adaptation of the items and cognitive interviews to identify if the items evaluated what was intended. A pilot test with 20 participants was also conducted. An initial confirmatory factor analysis was carried out. Given that, this analysis did not show a good adjustment of the theoretical model initially proposed, an
exploratory factor analysis was carried out to elucidate the most appropriate structure
for the Colombian population.

The factor analysis found five factors, each with a high ordinal alpha (Caregiving and family interaction, social interaction and future planning, Economy, and recreation, independent living skills or autonomy, and Services related to disability). Of the 76 items, 59 were preserved, which had a factorial load greater than 0.40; and 17 were
left out because they did not meet this requirement.

Future research considers corroborating the five factors found and establishing their clinical applications. Concerning the concurrent validity, the families perceive that high need for social interaction and future planning and little support for the person with an intellectual disability.

Diana Sthefanía Muñoz-Gómez, Universidad de La Sabana, Instituto de La Familia, Chia, Colombia


Victoria Eugenia Cabrera-García, Universidad de La Sabana, Instituto de La Familia, Chia, Colombia


Viviana Lucia Aya-Gómez, Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK


Muñoz-Gómez, D. S., Cabrera-García, V. E., & Aya-Gómez, V. L. (2023). Psychometric properties of the needs scale for families of adults with intellectual disabilities, Colombian version. Colombia Medica, 54(1), e2023674.

Olkin R. Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psychol. 2002; 8(2): 130-13.

Turnbull HR, Beegle G, Stowe MS. The core concepts of disability policy affecting families who have children with disabilities. J Disability Policy Studies. 2001; 12(3): 133-143.

Lightfoot E, LaLiberte T. Parental supports for parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual Developmental Disabilities. 2011; 49(5): 388-391.

Wade C, Llewellyn G, Matthews J. Modelling contextual influences on parents with intellectual disabilities and their children. Am J Intellectual Developmental Disabilities. 2011; (116): 419-43

Pérez V, Parra Z. El impacto del déficit mental en el ámbito familiar. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 2007; 23(3).

Dueñas E, Martínez M, Morales B, Muñoz C, Viáfara A, et al. Síndrome del cuidador de adultos mayores discapacitados y sus implicaciones psicosociales. Colom Med. 2006; 37(2): 31-38.

Chiu C, Kyzar K, Zuna N, Turnbull A, Summers J, Aya V. Family quality of life. In: Wehmeyer MW. Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

Barrera L, Carrillo GM, Chaparro L, Pinto N, Rodríguez A, Sánchez B. Effect of the Program "Caring for caretakers": Findings of a multicenter study. Colomb Med. 2011; 42(2): 35-44.

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe Mundial sobre la discapacidad. OMS; 2011. Available from:

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Censo General. DANE; 2005. Available from:

AAIDD. American association on intellectual and developmental disabilities. Washington, D.C. 2018. Available from:

Schalock RL, Luckasson R, Tassé MJ, Verdugo MA. A holistic theoretical approach to intellectual disability:Going beyond the four current perspectives. Intellect Dec Disabil. 2018; 56(2): 79-89.

Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.

Dillman D, Smyth J, Christian L. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009.

Aya-Gómez V, Ovalle Parra A, Cabrera-García V, Muñoz-Gómez D, Duque-Romero CA. Validation of the family needs assessment scale for Colombian families with children with intellectual disability. Internat J Disability Human Development. 2017; 16(3): 311-319.

Chiu C, Turnbull A, Summers J. What families need: validation of the family needs assessment for Taiwanese families of children with intellectual disability and developmental delay. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabil. 2013; 38:247-58.

Zuna N, Summers JA, Turnbull AP, Xiaoyi HSX. Theorizing about family quality of life. In: Kober R, editor. Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. From theory to practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2010:241-78.

Verdugo M, Córdoba L, Gómez J. Spanish adaptation and validation of the family quality of life survey. J Intell Disabil Res. 2005; 49:794-8.

Cohen R, Swerdlik M. Pruebas y evaluación psicológica: Introducción a las pruebas y a la medición. 4a.ed. México: McGraw-Hill; 2001.

Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opin Quart. 2007; 71: 287-311.

DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2012.

Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1994.

Cea DMA. Análisis multivariable. Teoría y práctica en la investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis; 2002.

Kabacoff RI. Determining the dimensionality of data: A SAS macro for parallel analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of SAS Users Group International. Seattle, WA; 2003.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston: Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon; 2006.

Frey B. Statistics hacks: Tips & Tools for Measuring the World and Beating the Odds. 1st ed. O'Reilly. Sebastopol: Greenstein TN, Davis SN; 2012.

Turnbull AA, Turnbull HR, Erwin EJ, Soodak LC, Shogren KA. Families, professionals, and exceptionalism: positive outcomes through partnerships and trust, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2011.Turnbull AA,

Kapitula LR. Estimating Ordinal Reliability Using SAS(r). Department of Statistics Grand Valley State University; 2014

Burton-Smith R, McVilly K, Yazbeck M, Parmenter T, Tsutsui T. Service and support needs of Australian carers supporting a family member with disability at home. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009; 34:239-47.

Buitrago M, Ortiz S, Eslava D. Necesidades generales de los cuidadores de las personas en situación de discapacidad. Investigación en Enfermería Imagen y Desarrollo. 2010; 12:59-77.

Aya V, Córdoba L. Asumiendo juntos los retos: Calidad de vida en familias de jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual. Rev Fac Med. 2013; 61:80-90.

Córdoba L, Mora A, Bedoya A, Verdugo M. Familias de adultos con discapacidad intelectual en Cali, Colombia, desde el modelo de calidad de vida. Psykhe. 2007; 16:29-42.

Mora A, Córdoba L, Bedoya A, Verdugo M. Características de la calidad de vida en familias con un adulto con discapacidad intelectual (DI)/RM en la ciudad de Cali, Colombia. Diversitas Perspectivas Psicología. 2007; 3:37-54.

Danies H, Tobón L, Monje M. Necesidades de economía y apoyos y servicios de familias con adultos trabajadores con discapacidad intelectual. Maestría. Universidad de La Sabana. Chía, Colombia; 2017.


Download data is not yet available.
Received 2017-12-05
Accepted 2023-02-27
Published 2023-05-16