Main Article Content

Authors

Objective: To establish the relationship between lifestyle for prevention of cervix and breast cancer and perceptual cognitive factors from the Pender model in working women.
Materials and methods: Correlation and cross-sectional study with a random sample of 143 working women. The Lifestyle index is the total score of 5 variables: Papanicolau test, breast self-exam, physical activity, body mass index, and cigarette smoking.
Results: The mean age for the sample was 44.4 + 6.2; 87% of the women had higher education and 85% were working in health care services. A total of 89% of the women had unhealthy lifestyles because of the lack of regular physical activity, not having a Papanicolau test according to the norm, not practicing breast self-exams, and having an altered body mass index. There was significant correlation between lifestyle and occupation, and also with self-efficacy perception for breast self-examination.
Conclusion: The lifestyles for most of the women sampled were unhealthy.
Recommendations: It is also recommend conducting culturally sensitive healthcare campaigns in addition to setting up flexible attention schedules for women.

World Health Organization (WHO). Women ́s health 2009.[Access May 2009]. Available in: G:ASBIB AS Memoryminiwomen healthOMS Women HealthWHO Women’shealth.mht2.Litaker D, Tomolo A. Association of contextual factors andbreast cancer screening: Finding new targets to promote earlydetection. J Women Health. 2007; 16: 36-47.3.OPS. Género, salud y desarrollo en las Américas, 2003.[Access July 30, 2008]. Available in: http://www.isis.cl/te-mas/salud/dicenque.htm#col4.Mejía A, Salas W. Costo-efectividad de la detección del virusdel papiloma humano en los programas de tamización decáncer de cuello uterino. Biomedica. 2008; 28: 160-72.5.Porter P. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality.Rev Salud Publica Mex. 2009; 51 (Supl 2): S141-66.Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC). Anuario estadísti-co. Volumen 4. Bogotá: INC; 2006.7.Hernández G, Herrán S, Cantor LF. Análisis de las tendenciasde mortalidad por cáncer de mama en Colombia y Bogotá,1981-2000. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2007; 11: 32-9.8.American Cancer Society. Global cancer statistics, 2002.Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 74-108.9.Wiesner C. Determinantes psicológicos, clínicos y socialesdel diagnóstico temprano del cáncer de mama en Bogotá,Colombia. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2007; 11: 13-22.10. Pender N, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health promotion innursing practice. 5a ed. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall;2006. p. 47.11. WHO. The World Health Report 2002. Reducing risks,promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO [Acceso Dic 2002].Available in: http://www.who.int12. Brønnum-Hansen H, Juel K, Davidsen M, Sørensen J. Impactof selected risk factors on expected lifetime without long-standing, limiting illness in Denmark. Prev Med. 2007; 45:49-53.13. Kraemer HC, Thiemann S. How many subjects? Statisticalpower analysis in research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1987. p.120.14. Goldbaum M. Estilos de vida y modernidad. Centro Interna-cional de Investigaciones para el Desarrollo (IDRC). [Access12 June 2006]. Available in http://www.idrc.ca/lacro/ev-23071-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html15. Andersen RM, Yu H, Wyn R, Davidson PL, Brown ER, TelekiS. Access to medical care for low-income persons: How docommunities make a difference? Med Care Res Rev. 2002; 59:384.16. Veugelers PJ, Yip AM, Kephart G. Proximate and contextualsocioeconomic determinants of mortality: Multilevelapproaches in a setting with universal health coverage. Am JEpidemiol. 2001; 154: 725.17. Soyer MT, Ciceklioglu M, Ceber E. Breast cancer awarenessand practice of breast self examination among primary healthcare nurses: influencing factors and effects of an in-serviceeducation. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 707-15.18. Díaz MT, Frutos M. Aumento de la citología cérvico-uterinaen mujeres de la Comuna 11 de Cali. Trabajo de investiga-ción, Especialización en Promoción de la Salud. ConvenioUniversidad de Caldas y Universidad del Valle, Cali; 2003.19. Profamilia. Resultados Encuesta Nacional de Demografía ySalud (ENDS). Bogotá: Profamilia; 2005. p. 208, 384.20. Lagoueyte MI. La citología vaginal mirada desde las mujeres.Inv Ed Enf. 2002; 20: 58-69.21. Wiesner C, Peñaranda D. Encuesta mundial de tabaquismo enjóvenes reporte de Bogotá, Colombia. Rev Colomb Cancerol.2002; 6: 5-14.22.Condiciones de salud en Cali. Memorias Foro Municipal porla Salud de Cali, julio 10 de 2007. Cali: CEDETES, Univer-sidad del Valle.23. Samet J. Los riesgos del tabaquismo activo y pasivo. SaludPublica Mex. 2002; 44 (Supl): 144-59.

Canaval, G. E., & Sánchez, M. N. (2024). Lifestyle and cancer prevention in female employees at a health institution. Colombia Medica, 42(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v42i2.768 (Original work published June 14, 2011)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1 2 > >>