Human prefrontal layer II interneurons in areas 46, 10 and 24
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Background: Prefrontal cortex (PFC) represents the highest level of integration and control of psychic and behavioral states. Several dysfunctions such as autism, hyperactivity disorders, depression, and schizophrenia have been related with alterations in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Among the cortical layers of the PFC, layer II shows a particular vertical pattern of organization, the highest cell density and the biggest non-pyramidal/pyramidal neuronal ratio. We currently characterized the layer II cytoarchitecture in human areas 10, 24, and 46.
Objective: We focused particularly on the inhibitory neurons taking into account that these cells are involved in sustained firing (SF) after stimuli disappearance.
Methods: Postmortem samples from five subjects who died by causes different to central nervous system diseases were studied. Immunohistochemistry for the neuronal markers, NeuN, parvalbumin, calbindin, and calretinin were used. NeuN targeted the total neuronal population while the rest of the markers specifically the interneurons.
Results: Cell density and soma size were statically different between areas 10, 46, 24 when using NeuN. Layer II of area 46 showed the highest cell density. Regarding interneurons, PV+-cells of area 46 showed the highest density and size, in accordance to the proposal of a dual origin of the cerebral cortex. Interhemispheric asymmetries were not identified between homologue areas.
Conclusion: First, our findings suggest that layer II of area 46 exhibits the most powerful inhibitory system compared to the other prefrontal areas analyzed. This feature is not only characteristic of the PFC but also supports a particular role of layer II of area 46 in SF. Additionally, known functional asymmetries between hemispheres might not be supported by morphological asymmetries.
- Cerebral cortex
- GABAergic neurons
- working memory
- calcium-binding proteins
- neocortical external granular layer
Yeterian E, Pandya D, Tomaiuolo F, Petrides M. The cortical connectivity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey brain. Cortex. 2012; 48(1): 58–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.004
Courchesne E, Mouton PR, Calhoun ME, Semendeferi K, Ahrens-Barbeau C, Hallet MJ, et al. Neuron number and size in prefrontal cortex of children with autism. JAMA. 2011; 306(18): 2001–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1638
Casanova MF. The neuropathology of autism. Brain Pathol. 2007; 17(4): 422–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00100.x
Oh DH, Son H, Hwang S, Kim SH. Neuropathological abnormalities of astrocytes, GABAergic neurons, and pyramidal neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices of patients with major depressive disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012; 22(5): 330–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.09.001
Halperin J, Schulz K. Revisiting the role of the prefrontal cortex in the pathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(4): 560–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.560
Gonzalez-Burgos G, Fish KN, Lewis DA. GABA neuron alterations, cortical circuit dysfunction and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Neural Plast. 2011; 2011: 723184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/723184
Glausier J, Lewis D. Selective pyramidal cell reduction of GABA(A) receptor a1 subunit messenger RNA expression in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(10): 2103–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.102
Zaitsev A, Povysheva N, Gonzalez-Burgos G, Rotaru1 D, Fish KN, Krimer LS, et al. Interneuron diversity in layers 2-3 of monkey prefrontal cortex. Cereb cortex. 2009; 19(7): 1597–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn198
Lewis DA, Hashimoto T, Volk DW. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6(4): 312–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1648
Ichinohe N. Small-scale module of the rat granular retrosplenial cortex: an example of the minicolumn-like structure of the cerebral cortex. Front Neuroanat. 2012; 5: 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2011.00069
Ichinohe N, Hyde J, Matsushita A, Ohta K, Rockland K. Confocal mapping of cortical inputs onto identified pyramidal neurons. Front Biosci. 2008; 13: 6354–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2741/3159
Ichinohe N, Fujiyama F, Kaneko T, Rockland KS. Honeycomb-like mosaic at the border of layers 1 and 2 in the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(4): 1372–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01372.2003
Escobar M, Pimienta H, Caviness V, Jacobson M, Crandall J, Kosik K. Architecture of apical dendrites in the murine neocortex: dual apical dendritic systems. Neuroscience. 1986; 17(4): 975–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(86)90074-6
Wang X-J Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol Rev. 2010; 90(3): 1195–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00035.2008
Compte A. Computational and in vitro studies of persistent activity: edging towards cellular and synaptic mechanisms of working memory. Neuroscience. 2006; 139(1): 135–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.011
Lara AH, Wallis JD. Executive control processes underlying multi-item working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(6): 876–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3702
Lewis DA, González-Burgos G. Neuroplasticity of neocortical circuits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33(1): 141–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301563
Elston G, Benavides-Piccione R, Elston A, Manger P, Defelipe J. Pyramidal cells in prefrontal cortex of primates: marked differences in neuronal structure among species. Front Neuroanat. 2011; 5: 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2011.00002
Dombrowski SM, Hilgetag CC, Barbas H. Quantitative architecture distinguishes prefrontal cortical systems in the rhesus monkey. Cereb Cortex. 2001; 11(10): 975–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.10.975
Barbas H. Connections underlying the synthesis of cognition, memory, and emotion in primate prefrontal cortices. Brain Res Bull. 2000; 52(5): 319–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00245-2
Condé F, Lund J, Jacobowitz D, Baimbridge K, Lewis D. Local circuit neurons immunoreactive for calretinin, calbindin D-28k or parvalbumin in monkey prefrontal cortex: distribution and morphology. J Comp Neurol. 1994; 341(1): 95–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903410109
Raghanti M, Spocter M, Butti C, Hof P, Sherwood C. A comparative perspective on minicolumns and inhibitory GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex. Front Neuroanat. 2010; 4: 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.05.003.2010
Druga R. Neocortical inhibitory system. Folia Biol (Praha) 2009; 55(6): 201–17.
DeFelipe J, Ballesteros-Yáñez I, Inda M, Muñoz A. Double-bouquet cells in the monkey and human cerebral cortex with special reference to areas 17 and 18. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 154: 15–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54002-6
Caputi A, Rozov A, Blatow M, Monyer H. Two calretinin-positive GABAergic cell types in layer 2/3 of the mouse neocortex provide different forms of inhibition. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19(6): 1345–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn175
Melchitzky D, Eggan S, Lewis D. Synaptic targets of calretinin-containing axon terminals in macaque monkey prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2005; 130(1): 185–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.046
Inan M, Blázquez-Llorca L, Merchán-Pérez A, Anderson S, DeFelipe J, Yuste R. Dense and overlapping innervation of pyramidal neurons by chandelier cells. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(5): 1907–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4049-12.2013
Gonzalez-Burgos G, Lewis D. GABA neurons and the mechanisms of network oscillations: implications for understanding cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008; 34(5): 944–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn070
Woodruff AR, Anderson SA, Yuste R. The enigmatic function of chandelier cells. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4: 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00201
Kaller CP, Loosli SV, Rahm B, Gössel A, Schieting S, Hornig T, et al. Working memory in schizophrenia: behavioral and neural evidence for reduced susceptibility to item-specific proactive interference. Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 76(6): 486–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.012
Eich T, Nee D, Insel C, Malapani C, Smith E. Neural correlates of impaired cognitive control over working memory in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 76(2): 146–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.09.032
Arnsten A, Wang M, Paspalas C. Neuromodulation of thought: flexibilities and vulnerabilities in prefrontal cortical network synapses. Neuron. 2012; 76(1): 223–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.038
Melchitzky DS, Lewis DA. Dendritic-targeting GABA neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex: comparison of somatostatin- and calretinin-immunoreactive axon terminals. Synapse. 2008; 62(6): 456–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20514
Lewis D, Melchitzky D, Gonzales-Burgos G. Specificity in the functional architecture of primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurocytol. 2002; 31(3-5): 265–76.
Opris I, Fuqua J, Huettl P, Gerhardt GA, Berger TW, Hampson RE, et al. Closing the loop in primate prefrontal cortex: inter-laminar processing. Front Neural Circuits. 2012; 6: 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2012.00088
Opris I, Hampson R, Gerhardt G, Berger T, Deadwyler S. Columnar processing in primate pFC: evidence for executive control microcircuits. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 24(12): 2334–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00307
Opris I, Santos L, Gerhardt GA, Song D, Berger TW, Robert E. et al. Prefrontal cortical microcircuits bind perception to executive control. Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 2285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02285
Opris I, Casanova M. Prefrontal cortical minicolumn: from executive control to disrupted cognitive processing. Brain. 2014;137(7):1863–1875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt359
Downloads
- David Riascos, Francisco Guzmán, Efraín Buriticá, Mauricio Palacios, Martha Isabel Escobar, Hernán Pimienta, Organotypic human neuronal culture derived from traumatic brain injury. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 39 No. 3.Supl.3 (2008): Neurociencias
- Carolina Isaza, Martha Isabel Escobar, Antonio Montoya, Jairo Sánchez, Estudio de alteraciones cromosómicas y su relación con el crecimiento in vitro en células de meningiomas. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 37 No. 1 (2006)
- Martha Isabel Escobar, Francisco Guzmán, Efraín Buriticá, David Riascos, Liliana Villamil, Hernán Pimienta, Changes in laminar and dendritic organization of the cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 39 No. 3.Supl.3 (2008): Neurociencias
- César A. Arango Dávila, Martha Isabel Escobar, Efraín Buriticá, Hernán Pimienta, Exofocal changes in experimental focal cerebral ischemia: an experimental approach and its clinical correlation. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 39 No. 3.Supl.3 (2008): Neurociencias
- Ives Chatain, Alberto Delgado, Martha Isabel Escobar, Vascularización del bazo y sus aplicaciones quirúrgicas , Colombia Medica: Vol. 16 No. 3,4 (1985)
- Adriana M. Medina, Norberto García Cairasco, Martha Isabel Escobar, Contralateral cortical response of a subpopulation of interneurons and the glial glutamate transporter GLT1 to an ischemic core. , Colombia Medica: Vol. 39 No. 3.Supl.3 (2008): Neurociencias
- Martha Isabel Escobar, The synapse: morphofunctional considerations , Colombia Medica: Vol. 18 No. 3 (1987)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use