Comparison of fishing nylon and polypropylene in abdominal wall closure
Main Article Content
To compare the usefulness and costs between nylon fishing line and polypropylene, the medical records of 585 patients with abdominal surgery at the Hospital Universitario San Juan de Dios in Cali, Colombia, in whom these two materials were used for abdominal wall closure, were studied.
The infection percentages with nylon and polypropylene were: clean surgeries, 2.8% and 2%; clean-contaminated surgeries, 0% and 1.8%; contaminated surgeries, 3.5% and 0%; and dirty surgeries, 3.4% and 4.7%. In the outpatient controls, both groups showed similar frequencies of complications, except for 5 cases of evisceration, all from sutures with polypropylene. Therefore, considering the great inferiority of the costs of sutures with fishing nylon, its use is considered a recommendable alternative.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use