Main Article Content

Authors




Background: Scholars have recently started to pay more attention in the potential of the inter-professional relationship between general practitioners and specialists to improve outcomes, through consideration given to the effect on prescribing practices. However, more empirical research is needed.



Objective: To explore inter-professional network factors that may explain the effects on General Practitioners prescription behaviours.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in an integrated diabetes care program. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews from 16 health practices and a hospital diabetes clinic, using a convenience sample of general practitioners, practice nurses, diabetes nurse specialists, and endocrinologists. A conceptual mapping was performed to identify factors underlying networks and effects on patient outcomes.

Results: Four themes with their concepts emerged from the conceptual map. These demonstrated the need for building effective communication channels to share experience and knowledge timely in diabetes care. Communication, collaboration, and coordination are critical factors to influence prescription behaviours within primary and secondary care.

Conclusions: Conceptual mapping allowed an understanding of factors that might explain how links between health professionals can improve patient outcomes at the primary and secondary care interface.


Nelson Alberto Aguirre Duarte, The University of Auckland Universidad del Rosario Universidad Javeriana

Medical Doctor and Surgeon. Master in Management and Business Administration. PhD in Health Sciences.

WHO . 2008-2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. 2008. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/9789241597418/en/.

Ehrlich C, Kendall E, Muenchberger H, Armstrong K. Coordinated care: what does that really mean?. Health Soc Care. Community. 2009; 17(6): 619–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00863.x

Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quarterly. 2005; 83(3): 457–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x

Farinha R, Oliveira MD, Sá AB. Networks of primary and secondary care services: how to organise services so as to promote efficiency and quality in access while reducing costs. Qual Prim Care. 2008; 16: 249–58.

Young GJ, Chamns MP, Desai K, Khuri SF, Forbes MG, Henderson W, et al. Patterns of Coordination and Clinical Outcomes: A Study of Surgical Services. Health Services Research. 1998; 33(5): 1211–36.

Smith J, Health Mo, editor Smith J. Critical analysis of the implementation of the Primary Health Care Strategy implementation and framing of issues for the next phase. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2009.

Davies GP, Harris M, Perkins D, Roland PM, Williams A, Larsen K, et al. Coordination of care within primary health care and with other sectors. NSW Australia: Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine. University of New South Wales; 2006.

Powell G, Williams A, Larsen K, Perkins D, Roland M, Harris MF. Coordinating primary health care: an analysis of the outcomes of a systematic review. Med J Australia. 2008; 188(8): S65–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01748.x

Rea H, Kenealy T, Horwood F, Sheridan N, Parsons M, Wemekamp B, et al. Integrated systems to improve care for very high intensity users of hospital emergency department and for long-term conditions in the community. N Z Med J. 2010; 123(1320): 76–85.

Granovetter M. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. J Economic Perspectives. 2005; 19(1): 33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958

Mehra A, Dixon A, Brass D, Robertson B. The social network ties of group leaders: implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science. 2006; 17(1): 64–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0158

Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties. Am J Sociol. 1973; 78(6): 1360–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Zaheer A, Gulati R, Nohria N. Strategic networks. Strategic Management J. 2000; 21(3): 203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K

Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management J. 1991; 12(S1): 105–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120909

Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp A, Seelig I, Shanman R, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 247–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00010

Greene A, Pagliari C, Cunningham S, Donnan P, Evans J, Emslie-Smith A, et al. Do managed clinical networks improve quality of diabetes care? Evidence from a retrospective mixed methods evaluation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18(6): 456–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.023119

Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; bmjqs(2011): 000187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187

Aguirre-Duarte N, Carswell P, Kenealy T. Association between inter-professional networks at the primary and secondary care interface and primary care physician prescription behaviours; 27th ANZAM Conference 2013 Managing on the Edge 27; 2013 December 4th; Hobart, Australia.

Aguirre-Duarte N, Carswell P, Kenealy T. Measuring inter-professional integration and influence on integrated careA social network approach. Int J Integr Care. 2013; 13(Suppl): 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1455

Aguirre-Duarte N, Carswell P, Kenealy T. Social Relations; Annual International Conference on Global Health Care; 2012 August; Singapore.

Oliveria SA, Lapuerta P, McCarthy BD, Italien GJ, Berlowitz DR, Asch SM. Physician- related barriers to the effective management of uncontrolled hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(4): 413–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.4.413

Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science. 1998; 9(2): 141–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141

Campbell S, MacDonald M, Carr B, Anderson D, MacKinley R, Cairns S. Bridging the gap between primary and secondary care: use of a clinical pathway for the investigation and management of deep vein thrombosis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008; 13(1): 15–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007015

Kvamme OJ, Olesen F, Samuelsson M. Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10: 33–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.10.1.33

Gribben B. Implementing integrated care in Counties Manukau. N Z Med J. 2003; 116(1169): U323–6.

Brady K, Auditor-General Oot Brady K. Ministry of Health and district health boards: Effectiveness of the "Get Checked" diabetes programme. Wellington: 2007.

Smith AE, Humphreys MS. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods. 2006; 38(2): 262–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192778

Aguirre Duarte, N. A. (2015). Increasing collaboration between health professionals: Clues and challenges. Colombia Medica, 46(2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v46i2.1526

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.