NEDOCS vs subjective evaluation, ¿Is the health personnel of the emergency department aware of its overcrowding?
Abstract
Introduction: An emergency department (ED) is considered to be "overcrowded" when the number of patients exceeds its treatment capacity and it does not have the conditions to meet the needs of the next patient to be treated. This study evaluates overcrowding in the emergency department of a hospital in Colombia.Objective: To compare the objective NEDOCS scale with a subjective evaluation by ED health staff in order to evaluate the differences between the two.Methods: The NEDOCS scale was applied and a subjective overcrowding survey was administered to the medical staff and the charge nurse on duty 6 times per day (6:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.) for three consecutive weeks. The results were evaluated with a correlation analysis and measurement of agreement.Results: A median NEDOCS score of 137 was obtained for the total data. There was a moderately positive correlation between the NEDOCS and the subjective scales, with a rho of 0.58 (p <0.001). During times when the ED was the most crowded, 87% of the total subjective health staff evaluations underestimated the level of overcrowding.Conclusions: Health staff do not perceive a risk due to ED overcrowding when the NEDOCS scores correspond to overcrowding categories equal to or over 5 (severely crowded and dangerously crowded), which poses a risk to patient safety and care.Authors
Downloads
Keywords
- Emergency medical services
- crowding
- attitude of health personnel
- surge capacity
- social perception
- health services needs and demands
References
Handel DA, Ginde AA, Raja AS, Rogers J, Sullivan AF, Espinola JA, et al. Implementation of crowding solutions from the American College of Emergency Physicians Task Force Report on Boarding. Int J Emerg Med. 2010; 3(4): 279-86.
Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Derlet R, King R, Bair A, Nick TG. Relationship between the National ED Overcrowding Scale and the number of patients who leave without being seen in an academic ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23(3): 288-94.
Kulstad EB, Sikka R, Sweis RT, Kelley KM, Rzechula KH. ED overcrowding is associated with an increased frequency of medication errors. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28(3): 304-9.
Richardson DB. Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(5): 213-6.
Sprivulis PC, Da Silva J-A, Jacobs IG, Frazer ARL, Jelinek GA. The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(5): 208-12.
Derlet R, Richards J, Kravitz R. Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(2):151-5.
Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Nick TG. Comparison of the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and the Emergency Department Work Index for quantifying emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(5): 513-8.
Weiss SJ, Derlet R, Arndahl J, Ernst AA, Richards J, Fernández-Frackelton M, et al. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(1): 38-50.
The University of New Mexico, Department of Emergency Medicine. NEDOCS Calculator. 2012. Available
from: http://emed.unm.edu/clinical/resources/nedocs.html.
Lambe S, Washington DL, Fink A, Laouri M, Liu H, Scura Fosse J, et al. Waiting times in California’s emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41(1): 35-44.
Anneveld M, van der Linden C, Grootendorst D, Galli-Leslie M. Measuring emergency department crowding in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands. Int J Emerg Med. 2013; 6(1): 21.
Jones SS, Allen TL, Flottemesch TJ, Welch SJ. An independent evaluation of four quantitative emergency department crowding scales. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(11): 1204-11.
Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52(2): 126-36.
Raj K, Baker K, Brierley S, Murray D. National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study tool is not useful in an Australian emergency department. Emerg Med Australas EMA. 2006; 18(3): 282-8.
Wang H, Robinson RD, Bunch K, Huggins CA, Watson K, Jayswal RD, et al. The inaccuracy of determining overcrowding status by using the national ED overcrowding study tool. Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32(10): 1230-6.
Drummond AJ. No room at the inn: overcrowding in Ontario’s emergency departments. CJEM. 2002; 4(2): 91-7.
Reeder TJ, Burleson DL, Garrison HG. The overcrowded emergency department: a comparison of staff perceptions. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(10): 1059-64.
Trzeciak S. Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):402-5.19.
Forster AJ, Stiell I, Wells G, Lee AJ, van Walraven C. The effect of hospital occupancy on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(2):127-33.
Copyright (c) 2017 Universidad del Valle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use
