Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Page Header Logo
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Focus and scope
    • Editorial Management Process
  • EDITORIAL POLICY
    • Ethical Publication Standards
    • Open Access Policy
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright
    • Policy for Journal Archiving
    • Claim Policy
  • AUTHORS
    • Guidelines to Authors
    • Sending and Receiving Papers
    • Structure and Content of Articles
    • Article Evaluation Process
    • ORCID
    • coi_disclosure Colombia Médica ICMJE
    • Copyright Transfer Statement Colombia Médica
  • PEER REVIEW
    • Peer Review Process
    • Evaluation Forms
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • Editorial team
    • Contact
  • ARTICLES
    • Current
    • Archives
  • COLLECTIONS
Search
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol 48 No 2 (2017) /
  4. Original Articles

NEDOCS vs subjective evaluation, ¿Is the health personnel of the emergency department aware of its overcrowding?

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Author Biographies
  • References

Abstract

Introduction: An emergency department (ED) is considered to be "overcrowded" when the number of patients exceeds its treatment capacity and it does not have the conditions to meet the needs of the next patient to be treated. This study evaluates overcrowding in the emergency department of a hospital in Colombia.Objective: To compare the objective NEDOCS scale with a subjective evaluation by ED health staff in order to evaluate the differences between the two.Methods: The NEDOCS scale was applied and a subjective overcrowding survey was administered to the medical staff and the charge nurse on duty 6 times per day (6:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.) for three consecutive weeks. The results were evaluated with a correlation analysis and measurement of agreement.Results: A median NEDOCS score of 137 was obtained for the total data. There was a moderately positive correlation between the NEDOCS and the subjective scales, with a rho of 0.58 (p <0.001). During times when the ED was the most crowded, 87% of the total subjective health staff evaluations underestimated the level of overcrowding.Conclusions: Health staff do not perceive a risk due to ED overcrowding when the NEDOCS scores correspond to overcrowding categories equal to or over 5 (severely crowded and dangerously crowded), which poses a risk to patient safety and care.

Authors

  • Mauricio García-Romero Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
  • Claudia Geraldine Rita-Gáfaro Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
  • Jairo Quintero-Manzano Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
  • Anderson Bermon 1-Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia. 2-Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords

  • Emergency medical services
  • crowding
  • attitude of health personnel
  • surge capacity
  • social perception
  • health services needs and demands

Author Biographies


, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Departamento de Urgencias, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.

, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Departamento de Urgencias, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.

, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.
Departamento de Urgencias, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.

, 1-Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia. 2-Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

1  Centro de Investigaciones de la Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Floridablanca, Colombia.

2 Estudiante PhD Epidemiología y Bioestadística, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

References

Handel DA, Ginde AA, Raja AS, Rogers J, Sullivan AF, Espinola JA, et al. Implementation of crowding solutions from the American College of Emergency Physicians Task Force Report on Boarding. Int J Emerg Med. 2010; 3(4): 279-86.

Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Derlet R, King R, Bair A, Nick TG. Relationship between the National ED Overcrowding Scale and the number of patients who leave without being seen in an academic ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23(3): 288-94.

Kulstad EB, Sikka R, Sweis RT, Kelley KM, Rzechula KH. ED overcrowding is associated with an increased frequency of medication errors. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28(3): 304-9.

Richardson DB. Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(5): 213-6.

Sprivulis PC, Da Silva J-A, Jacobs IG, Frazer ARL, Jelinek GA. The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust. 2006; 184(5): 208-12.

Derlet R, Richards J, Kravitz R. Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(2):151-5.

Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Nick TG. Comparison of the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale and the Emergency Department Work Index for quantifying emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(5): 513-8.

Weiss SJ, Derlet R, Arndahl J, Ernst AA, Richards J, Fernández-Frackelton M, et al. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(1): 38-50.

The University of New Mexico, Department of Emergency Medicine. NEDOCS Calculator. 2012. Available

from: http://emed.unm.edu/clinical/resources/nedocs.html.

Lambe S, Washington DL, Fink A, Laouri M, Liu H, Scura Fosse J, et al. Waiting times in California’s emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41(1): 35-44.

Anneveld M, van der Linden C, Grootendorst D, Galli-Leslie M. Measuring emergency department crowding in an inner city hospital in The Netherlands. Int J Emerg Med. 2013; 6(1): 21.

Jones SS, Allen TL, Flottemesch TJ, Welch SJ. An independent evaluation of four quantitative emergency department crowding scales. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(11): 1204-11.

Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52(2): 126-36.

Raj K, Baker K, Brierley S, Murray D. National Emergency Department Overcrowding Study tool is not useful in an Australian emergency department. Emerg Med Australas EMA. 2006; 18(3): 282-8.

Wang H, Robinson RD, Bunch K, Huggins CA, Watson K, Jayswal RD, et al. The inaccuracy of determining overcrowding status by using the national ED overcrowding study tool. Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32(10): 1230-6.

Drummond AJ. No room at the inn: overcrowding in Ontario’s emergency departments. CJEM. 2002; 4(2): 91-7.

Reeder TJ, Burleson DL, Garrison HG. The overcrowded emergency department: a comparison of staff perceptions. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10(10): 1059-64.

Trzeciak S. Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):402-5.19.

Forster AJ, Stiell I, Wells G, Lee AJ, van Walraven C. The effect of hospital occupancy on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(2):127-33.

  • PDF
  • PDF (Español (España))
  • Full Text
  • HTML (Español (España))
Published
2017-06-28
Submitted
2015-10-16
| 416 |
How to Cite
García-Romero, M., Rita-Gáfaro, C., Quintero-Manzano, J., & Bermon, A. (2017). NEDOCS vs subjective evaluation, ¿Is the health personnel of the emergency department aware of its overcrowding?. Colombia Médica, 48(2), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v48i2.2131
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
Issue
Vol 48 No 2 (2017)
Section
Original Articles

Copyright (c) 2017 Universidad del Valle

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use

Online ISSN: 1657-9534
Make a Submission

Bibliographics database

Full-text database

Citation Index

Bibliographical information system

Memberships

Licencia Creative Commons
This work is under License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) .

Indexed

.
0.82
2018CiteScore
 
 
68th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
.
Information
  • For Authors
Universidad del Valle
Universidad del Valle
  • Cali - Colombia
  • © 1994 - 2020
Dirección:
  • Ciudad Universitaria Meléndez
  • Calle 13 # 100-00
  •  
  • Sede San Fernando
  • Calle 4B N° 36-00
PBX:
  • +57 2 3212100
  • Línea gratuita: 018000 22 00 21
  • A.A.25360
Redes Sociales:

2020 Universidad del Valle - Vigilada MinEducación

//Go to www.addthis.com/dashboard to customize your tools