Content quality and reliability of the YouTube videos about chronic prostatitis
Main Article Content
Background: YouTube is one of the most used social media platforms for accessing health information. Objective: To evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chronic prostatitis.
Methods: YouTube search using the keywords "kronik prostatit" for Turkish videos and 'chronic prostatitis' for English videos were done. The videos were evaluated through modified-Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and Video Power Index (VPI) scoring systems. The characters of the videos were also recorded and analyzed.
Results: Of the 65 Turkish videos, videos of health professions (HPv) were uploaded 58 and seven videos of laypersons (Lv). There were no significant differences between the views, like counts, VPI, or the content quality and reliability of HPv and Lv. Of the 62 English videos, videos of HP were uploaded 40 and 22 videos of laypersons. Although HPv were found to have greater DISCERN and JAMA values, Lv had more views, view ratio, and Video Power Index than HPv. When all 127 videos were evaluated regardless of the language, Lv were found to have more total views and ratings, but there were no significant differences between like ratio, VPI, DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS values between the two groups.
Conclusions: Most YouTube videos about chronic prostatitis did not have enough quality and reliable information. Health associations should be more attentive to posting more content videos of sufficient quality and reliability on social media platforms.
- prostatitis
- Social media
- instructional film and video
- Erectile Dysfunction
- Information Seeking Behavior
- Premature Ejaculation
- prostate
- smartphone
- Urologists
- Urology
- Consumer Health Information
- Infertility, Male
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Hypogonadism
- Pelvic Pain
Borgmann H, Salem J, Baunacke M, Boehm K, Groeben C, Schmid M, et al. Mapping the landscape of urology: A new media-based cross-sectional analysis of public versus academic interest. Int J Urol. 2018; 25(5): 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13527 PMid:29520842
Zaila KE, Osadchiy V, Anderson AS, Eleswarapu SV, Mills JN. Popularity and worldwide reach of targeted, evidence-based internet streaming video interventions focused on men's health topics. Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9(3): 1374-1381. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-580 PMid:32676422 PMCid:PMC7354348
Warren CJ, Sawhney R, Shah T, Behbahani S, Sadeghi-Nejad H. YouTube and Men's Health: A review of the current literature. Sex Med Rev. 2021; 9(2): 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.09.002 PMid:33610492
Pratsinis M, Abt D, Müllhaupt G, Langenauer J, Knoll T, Schmid HP, et al. Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube. World J Urol. 2021; 39(3): 935-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03236-6 PMid:32468108
Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Ozsoy-Unubol T. Akyuz G. Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation? J Cancer Surviv. 2022; 16(5): 1016-1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01093-9 PMid:34347245
Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018; 43(22): E1334-e1339. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691 PMid:29664816
Toprak T, Tokat E. A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(4): 449.e1-449.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014 PMid:33824069
Nishizaki N, Hirano D, Oishi K, Shimizu T. YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: A content-quality and reliability analysis. Pediatr Int. 2022; 64(1): e15049. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15049 PMid:34747553
Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; 39(5): 899-903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114 PMid:22467934
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2004.https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428
Batur AF, Altintas E, Gul M. Evaluation of YouTube videos on primary bladder pain syndrome. Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 33(5): 1251-1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05107-7 PMid:35181830
Morra S, Collà Ruvolo C, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Celentano G, Califano G, et al. YouTube(TM) as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022; 41(1): 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24802 PMid:34559920
Pratsinis M, Babst C, Langenauer J, Schmid HP, Piller A, Neuenschwander A, et al. Qualitative assessment of medical information on YouTube: A multilingual comparison of common urological conditions. Urol Int. 2021; 105(9-10): 757-763. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517292 PMid:34289487
Jain N, Abboudi H, Kalic A, Gill F, Al-Hasani H. YouTube as a source of patient information for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol. 2019; 74(1): 79 e11-79 e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.09.004 PMid:30322707
Ji L, Sebesta EM, Stumbar SE, Rutman MP, Chung DE. Evaluating the quality of overactive bladder patient education material on YouTube: a pilot study using the patient education materials assessment tool. Urology. 2020; 145: 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.009 PMid:32827536
Brochu F, Robins S, Miner SA, Grunberg PH, Chan P, Lo K, et al. Searching the internet for infertility information: a survey of patient needs and preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(12): e15132. https://doi.org/10.2196/15132 PMid:31829963 PMCid:PMC6933516
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copy rights of the articles published in Colombia Médica belong to the Universidad del Valle. The contents of the articles that appear in the Journal are exclusively the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editorial Committee of the Journal. It is allowed to reproduce the material published in Colombia Médica without prior authorization for non-commercial use