Main Article Content

Authors

Objective: To explore some factors associated to stunted growth in children below 11 years of age in the Department of Antioquia.
Methodology: Cross-sectional study using the databases of alimentary and nutritional profiles in homes of Antioquia in 2004, based on a representative random sample of homes in the department (95% reliability and error margin of 3%). For this study, 100% of the records of children below 11 years of age were used. A model of generalized equations estimation was constructed for stunted growth classified by a Z score smaller than -2 standard deviation with respect to p 50 of the 1978 NCHS (Centro Nacional de Estadísticas de la Salud -  National Center for Health Statistics). Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX Procedure: SAS version 9.1.
Results: We found 18.6% of the children with stunted growth, 75% of the homes with male head of household, 70% of heads of household with maximum 5 years of schooling; 47% of homes were nucleated bi-parental, and 40% extensive with a 5-member median per home; 56.4% poor per unsatisfied basic needs, and 80% in alimentary insecurity. The factors associated to stunted growth were: female gender, 1-5 years of age, head of household with less than 6 years of schooling, more than 5 people in the home, more than two household members under 7 years of age, coming from a poor home per unsatisfied basic needs, belonging to a sub-region different from Medellin, food availability of less than 30 different foods per week, no production of food, and head of household under 40 years of age.
Conclusions: Herein, we show evidence of the magnitude of poverty and association of precarious socioeconomic conditions with stunted growth in Antioquia. The study shows the importance of considerin

Álvarez M, Benjumea M, Roldán P, Maya M, Martínez M,Montoya E. Perfil alimentario y nutricional de los hogares deldepartamento de Antioquia. Medellín: Universidad deAntioquia, Gobernación de Antioquia; 2005.2.Restrepo M. Los indicadores antropométricos en la evalua-ción del estado nutricional. Estado nutricional y crecimientofísico. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia; 2000. p. 127-58.3.Flórez C. La equidad en el sector salud: una mirada de diezaños. Documento de trabajo N° 6. Bogotá: Fundación Corona,Fundación FORD; 2002.4.Aramburo C, Arango J, Vélez L. Urabá.Desarrollo regional:una tarea común universidad-región. Medellín: Universidadde Antioquia; 2000.5.Arango M, Maya M, Bejarano O. Bajo Cauca. Desarrolloregional: una tarea común universidad-región. Medellín:Universidad de Antioquia; 2000.6.Herrán O, Prada G. Nutrición y socioeconomía: un estudio enniños pobres. Perspct Nutr Hum. 2001; 5: 11-29.7.Profamilia, Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar,USAID, Ministerio de la Protección Social. Encuesta nacio-nal de demografía y salud 2005: salud sexual y reproductivaen Colombia. Bogotá: Profamilia; 2005. p. 266-86.8.Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar. Encuesta nacio-nal de la situación nutricional en Colombia. Bogotá:Profamilia, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Universidad deAntioquia, Organización Panamericana de la Salud, InstitutoColombiano de Bienestar Familiar; 2005. p. 69-120.9.Sakisaka K, Wakai S, Kuroiwa C, Cuadra-Flores L, Kai I,Mercedes-Aragón M, et al. Nutritional status and associatedfactors in children aged 0-23 months in Granada, Nicaragua.Public Health. 2006; 120: 400-11.10. Khuwaja S, Shah S. Prevalence and correlates of stuntingamong primary school children in rural areas of southernPakistan. J Trop Pediatr. 2005; 51: 72-7.11. Arriagada I. Estructuras familiares, trabajo y bienestar enAmérica Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL; 2003.12. Guevara D. Dinámica de la pobreza en Colombia: análisis delos ingresos de jefes de hogar urbano 1984-2003. Econ Desarr.(Colombia) 2005; 4: 76-108.13. Profamilia, Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar,USAID, Ministerio de la Protección Social. Encuesta nacio-nal de demografía y salud 2005: salud sexual y reproductivaen Colombia. Bogotá: Profamilia; 2005. p. 29-47.14. Fisberg RM, Cardoso MR. Nutritional status and factorsassociated with stunting in children attending public daycarecenters in the Municipality of São Paulo, Brazil. Cad SaudePublica. 2004; 20: 812-7.15. Sereebutra P, Aliyu M, Jolly P. Sociodemographic andenvironmental predictors of childhood stunting in rural Gua-temala. Nutr Res. 2006; 26: 65-70.16. Comisión Económica para América Latina. Avances recientesen la reducción de la pobreza. Panorama social de AméricaLatina 2005. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, Naciones Unidas;2006. p. 59-92.17. Contraloría General de la República. El debate sobre eltamaño de la pobreza en Colombia. Econ Desarr.2004; 303:97-106.18. Lora E. Técnicas de medición económica. Metodología yaplicaciones en Colombia. 3ª ed. Bogotá: Alfaomega Colom-biana SA; 2005.19. Álvarez M, Rosique J, Restrepo M. Seguridad alimentaria enlos hogares de Acandi: la disponibilidad de los alimentoscomo indicador de suficiencia alimentaria. Rev Chil Nutr.2004; 31: 318-29.

Castro, B. A., González, E. R., Álvarez, M. C., & Segura, A. M. (2024). Factors associated with stunted growth in children below 11 years of age in Antioquia, Colombia, 2004. Colombia Medica, 42(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v42i2.772

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Received 2011-06-13
Accepted 2011-06-13
Published 2024-07-23