Main Article Content

Authors

Purpose: To describe physical activity (PA) practice in college youth from some Colombian universities, and to identify its relation to their motivations (to do it, to not do it, and to change it), and the available resources. Method: A total of 1811 students between 15 and 24 years of age from six Colombian universities participated. The Physical Activity scale from the College Youth Lifestyle Questionnaire was used. Results: It was found that 22.2% of the students have PA practices. The main motivations to practice PA were «to benefit health» (45.8%) and «to look better» (32%), while the reason to not practicing it was «laziness» (61.5%). PA was higher in those who were satisfied with the changes they have made and are planning to maintain them (66%), and in those that have some resources, such as sports accessories, time, abilities, psychical skills, good health status, psychical activities and sports' offer and knowledge on how to perform well. Conclusions: The results show that to prevent and to modify sedentary lifestyles in young individuals, it is necessary to incorporate aspects such as motivations to change and obtaining of resources.

Organización Panamericana de la Salud [sede web]. Washing-ton, US. 2007. [fecha de acceso noviembre 27 de de 2008].Salud en las Américas. Disponible en http://www.per.ops-oms.org/sea-07/SEA-2007-3.pdf2.World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physicalactivity and health [sede Web]. 2003 [fecha de acceso enero 20de 2009]. Physical activity. Disponible en http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/media/en/gsfs_pa.pdf3.Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar [sede Web]. Co-lombia. 2005 [fecha de acceso enero 20 de 2009]. EncuestaNacional de la Situación Nutricional en Colombia. Estadonutricional por indicadores antropométricos. Disponible enhttp://www.presidencia.gov.co/sne/2005/noviembre/08/general.pdf4.Equipo CEDETES-Universidad del Valle y Grupo de Vigilan-cia en Salud Pública Secretaría Municipal de Salud Pública.Factores de riesgo asociados a enfermedades crónicas notransmisibles en población de 18 años y más, Cali 2007.Boletín Epidemiológico de Cali. Cali: Secretaría Municipal deSalud Pública; 2006. p. 42-7.5.Bolaños DF. El deporte y su acción societal. Kinesis. 2005;43: 31-6.6.Vainio H, Bianchini F. Physical activity and cancer prevention- is ‘no pain, no gain’ passe? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001; 10:301-2.7.Rojas ME. Aspectos epidemiológicos y psicológicos de laactividad y la inactividad física. En: Flórez L, Botero MM yMoreno B. Psicología de la salud. Temas actuales de inves-tigación en Latinoamérica. Bogotá: ALAPSA; 2005. p. 153-78.8.Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exerciseyour heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat RevNeurol. 2008; 9: 58-65.9.Gámez R. Intervenciones efectivas en promoción de la activi-dad física. Kinesis. 2005; 42: 58-61.10. Ang ET, Gómez F. Potential therapeutic effects of exercise tothe brain. Curr Med Chem. 2007; 14: 2564-71.11. Stevens TA, To Y, Stevenson SJ, Lochbaum MR. Theimportance of physical activity and physical education in theprediction of academic achievement. J Sport Beh. 2008; 31:368-88.12. Gómez LF, Mateus JC, Cabrera G. Leisure-time physicalactivity among women in a neighbourhood in Bogotá, Colom-bia: Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates. Cad SaudePublica. 2004; 20: 1103-9.13. Lema LF, Salazar IC, Varela MT, Díaz JA, Rubio A, BoteroA. Comportamiento y salud de los jóvenes universitarios:Satisfacción con el estilo de vida. Pens Psicol. 2009; 5: 71-88.14. Pavón A, Moreno JA. Actitud de los universitarios ante lapráctica físico-deportiva: Diferencias por géneros. RevPsicolDeport. 2008; 17: 7-23.

Varela, M. T., Duarte, C., Salazar, I. C., Lema, L. F., & Tamayo, J. A. (2024). Physical activity and sedentary behavior in college youth from Colombian cities: practices, motivations, and resources. Colombia Medica, 42(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v42i3.872 (Original work published September 26, 2011)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.